A Question of Control

Posted on September 11th, 2009 by Drazen Drazic

By Declan Ingram

There has been a lot of discussion on here about 3rd party/cloud computing etc security (or lack there of). For many, this didn’t seem hugely relevant at the time as there was always a choice (or people just didn’t think it was going to be something that affected them). Recently however, the choice seems to be getting smaller.

The 3rd party management model is becoming…or should I say, has become, so popular now, that it is hard to keep control. (Control? Yes, of your information!).

Think about it. How much of your security is technically enforced by a 3rd party appliance? (And, how secure are they?) How much of your data is housed, managed, monitored, etc by a 3rd party? Professionally and personally we are giving ourselves away. More importantly, has this been looked at during your last Threat Risk Assessment? (Has you organisation even done one?)

From my experience, so many organisations that we audit have core data and systems housed and managed by 3rd parties, and nearly all of them have dangerously one sided contracts……Dangerously favouring the 3rd party.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Bad Stuff, Dumb Security, Industry Specialists Talk, Risk Management, governance | 12 Comments »

Police Checks on Employees – Important Considerations

Posted on August 10th, 2009 by Drazen Drazic

By SGirl:

An interesting question came across our desk this week to do with police checks on current employees and potential new employees.

Things like PCI and the increasing awareness of the human factor of security threats means more and more organisations are getting police checks done on candidates and as part of an ongoing assurance program.

So what happens if you get a report returned that shows a conviction?  What do you do? Sack the employee? Not hire them? Perhaps, perhaps not.

While some organisations have a legal requirement not to employ anyone with a criminal history (working with children, issuing licences to name a few), for others the requirements and boundaries that need to be considered are a little greyer.

Essentially there are basic human rights that prevent discrimination in the workplace, including whether or not a person has a criminal conviction. The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission have a discussion paper on it:

http://www.hreoc.gov.au/human_rights/criminalrecord/summary.html

To avoid discrimination on the basis of criminal record, an employer can only refuse to employ a person if their criminal record prevents them from being unable to perform the ‘inherent requirements’ of the job.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Industry Specialists Talk, Risk Management, cyber crime, governance | No Comments »

ACMA, Copyright, Privacy and other un-newsworthy things…….

Posted on June 25th, 2009 by Drazen Drazic

By SGirl:

Who will I upset this time? Though the support far outweighed the few negative comments. But, I digress…..

It is interesting the information that you can find when you look really hard and spend a bit of time to get results.

As a bit of background, to me, IT security is not just all about technical solutions, hacking and latest marketing terms like the “Cloud”. It is also about management, strategy, compliance (not the dirty version). It’s many areas that for some reason, the media don’t really report nor focus upon (unless your compliance means PCI DSS). It’s the less “sexy” part of the industry, but for much, the parts that hit the coalface of the business.

In Australia, there are things happening that you hear little to nothing about – things that are affecting businesses and compliance considerations now. They aren’t being focused upon and far from hot topics like PCI DSS; “Ooh merchants might start being fined soon and let’s start talking about what PCI DSS is, and means to you and how vendor X is going to help you”! We only hear about what a few decide is “sexy” but for most part and as recent conversations here in this blog and forums have shown, what those individuals are deciding as “interesting” seems not to be what is floating the boats of many in the industry. Drazen Drazic gets most of his news from blogs he says.

Let have a look at a few things:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Industry Specialists Talk, PCI, PCI DSS, Risk Management, governance | 9 Comments »

Approach and position on IT, Information Economy, Security II (By SGirl)

Posted on May 16th, 2009 by Drazen Drazic

By SGirl:

It is not just the government. The whole industry doesn’t care enough to pay sufficient attention to the message that is being sent in regards to IT Security to business. (I am not even going to bother with the national IT Agenda – that is a whole other rant). It is largely cultural. And I don’t know if it will change. Let’s start with the government.

You have local, state and federal government and within this, a plethora of agencies, departments, bodies and statutory authorities that have their own areas of responsibility. Pretty much at every level and at every segment they are putting out a message about IT security.

Some push a dedicated IT security message, others push a particular message for a particular sector or area of industry….and many are pushing the same message to the same segment in different areas of the country.  Their intentions vary too, and this also plays a part in what message is sent.

For some the root intent is social responsibility – for others it is purely political (eg; Internet Filtering anyone?), jumping onto topical interest bites or even just using up budget allocations pointlessly to keep jobs and play the games that governments play.

Not one though in my opinion gives sufficient information for a business of any size (small, medium and large) to understand and appreciate all that they should be knowing and doing to target new threats of doing business facilitated by technology. And few ever and consistently say things in alignment with each other. You have to wonder….

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Bad Stuff, Dumb Security, Industry Specialists Talk, Risk Management, WTF, cyber crime, governance | 11 Comments »

Wanted – Web Developer: Must Understand Security

Posted on April 3rd, 2009 by Drazen Drazic

By Declan Ingram

An interesting thing happened today. Someone asked me to find a Australian web development company who advertise themselves as developing secure code. (Editor Note: Surely that goes without saying Decman? LOL)

Simple Google search, I thought…Well guess how many web development companies I found who specify that they write secure code?

NONE. Yep! That’s right. Of course if you ask them, “Hey are the sites that you develop secure?”. You know the response is going to be “Oh Definitely!”, until they hand you the completed site, all shiny and new……you perform some security testing and BAM – the response becomes “Oh CRAP!”

So, if there are any developers out there who want a niche – learn to write good code and advertise it…..but first, let me know….there may well be a job in it for you!

PS. It is possible that all web developers write secure code, so it isn’t a differentiator worth advertising…..in which case next time I go flying, I’ll take a screaming pig and not a Robin 2160!

Editor Note: This can be done but “security” costs extra on websites – or so many of our clients have been told by dev shops in the past after our testing for them has broken the sites :) To be fair as you know, we’ve spent a good deal of time with dev shops after such events to help train their developers and credit to those guys. They should be using this as a differentiator. Sad that something like this which should be standard is considered such.

Posted in Applications, Bad Developers, Bad Stuff, Disclosure Laws, Industry Specialists Talk, Web Application Security | 2 Comments »

Cyber Security at the Crossroads

Posted on March 12th, 2009 by Drazen Drazic

I enjoy David’s writing and his analogies between insecure software and the issues we face from it today and those in other industries and other times.

He’s kicked-off a series of posts titled; “Cyber Security at the Crossroads” on his blog. Worth a read:

Cyber Security at the Crossroads: Introduction
Cyber Security at the Crossroads: Bad Treatment

This higher-level view vs. “otherworld” case studies – present and past, is often overlooked in our industry, but it is the way to opening up understanding, awareness and discussion on this topic to broader society. Is there a better way?

Posted in Applications, Bad Developers, Industry Specialists Talk, Research, Web Application Security, cyber crime | 1 Comment »

Be Alert…Not Alarmed (Looking at Internet Filtering in Australia)

Posted on October 25th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By straxd

So Australia’s apparently getting filtering technology that’s mandatory for anyone who accesses the Internet.  Links about it are growing. Some examples are here, here and here.

In summary, it’s basically the Great Firewall of China but marketed slightly differently for the discerning Australian audience. Notice how Senator Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (yes that is his title), says; “I was wondering if I could get the questions without it being accused of being the Great Wall of China” but not actually providing to us all the differences between China and what’s planned here.

Of course when we’re thinking technically here, what they’re planning won’t work – we know that. It’s simple enough to use a proxy or, if you want to be really clever, tunnel through an encrypted connection to somewhere with more freedoms of the Internet like Iran or Afghanistan. :) If they think this is going to do anything to stop child pornography then they’re either stupid or misguided. [DD Note: what..you give them two options?]
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Bad Stuff, Dumb Security, Firewalls, Industry Specialists Talk, Internet Filtering, WTF, cyber crime | 9 Comments »

Attack Vectors – Never Discount Anything…(as we always say…)

Posted on October 17th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By Declan Ingram

Chip and pin scam ‘has netted millions from British shoppers’

Good example here of a creative attack vector. This is also one that we have been talking about for some time……and each time we do, people have rolled their eyes and made jokes about tin foil hats. :-)

Whilst this is obviously a bad thing, I can’t help but think how good it is that there is media attention for it now and people can start thinking about it.

Posted in Bad Stuff, Industry Specialists Talk, Research, Vulnerability Management, cyber crime | 1 Comment »

News from the Kiwicon Conference

Posted on October 1st, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By Declan Ingram

Kiwicon 2008 has come to a close and the crowds have left with a trail of coffee cups and empty beer kegs. The line up this year for the second annual New Zealand IT Security / Hacker Conference included a mixture of the usual suspects and first time presenters, which is always good to see.

Highlights this year included “The Paul Craig Omnibus”, Brett Moore’s “Hacking Citrix in 2008″ and Longpipes’ “Sekret Lightning Talk”.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Industry Specialists Talk, Research | 6 Comments »

Vulnerability Assessment, DNS vuln and SaaS…..

Posted on August 5th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By Amit Deshmukh

The DNS vulnerability recently discovered by Dan Kaminsky allowed researchers and vendors from across the world to collaborate over fixing the issue. (Details available here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-9998906-83.html). Old news but……

Since then a number of security solution vendors have jumped onto the bandwagon of the week. (There seem to be so many of them of late!) and have provided their own versions of how best to identify and solve the problems.

Many vulnerability detection solutions now have begun detecting the DNS issue and have updated their signatures to verify the existence of the problem. However, it is critical that a company assessing its infrastructure for this vulnerability understands their DNS environment before they begin to audit their systems for this flaw, as this article very rightly points out: http://blog.tenablesecurity.com/2008/07/but-i-patched-o.html
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Industry Specialists Talk, Research, Risk Management, Vulnerability Management | 8 Comments »

Talking with David Rice; insecure software implications, regulation, vendors, making change and other things….

Posted on July 29th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

David Rice is an internationally recognised information security professional and author of the critically acclaimed book, “Geekonomics: The Real Cost of Insecure Software.”  For a decade he has advised, counseled, and defended global IT networks for government and private industry. David has been awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense for “significant contributions” advancing security of critical national infrastructure and global networks. He is a frequent speaker at information security conferences and currently Director of The Monterey Group.

I had a chance to talk with David recently and I hope you enjoy the read.

———————————————————————————-

BorB: Thank you for taking the time for a chat David. I thoroughly enjoyed the book and would recommend it to everyone. What’s the feedback been like from the industry and non-industry (consumers) in general?

DR: Thank you for the opportunity to join the discussion on your blog. Feedback from the information security industry has been overwhelmingly positive. Defending against an unrelenting stream of software vulnerabilities is simply unsustainable. It also happens to be ridiculously expensive. I think people get that point. Software manufacturers and security vendors have led us into a cul-de-sac that we have been wandering around in for a few years, and the frustration is palpable. I think approaching insecure software from an economic perspective has started opening doors that lead out of the cul-de-sac and there is a feeling of hope in that.

The response from outside the information security industry, particularly consumers, has been a mixture of enlightenment, shock, and dismay. For example, a U.S. government representative stated to me, “I can’t put [the book] down. It’s incredible because I’ve never really thought about things this way before.” On a recent radio interview the host asked (rather desperately I might add), “Why isn’t this stuff [cyber attacks] being reported? What do we do?” By the tone of his voice, I could tell he was truly disturbed as well as surprised. It was as if someone told him cigarettes cause lung cancer, manufacturing creates pollution, or fatty foods cause heart disease. Yes, indeed, software can have significant private and social costs also.

On the whole, I think these reactions are healthy and normal. Some people are getting concerned, and some angry. These reactions, and those like them, are understandable and I take such reactions as a good sign. It means that listeners are re-adjusting their viewpoints based on the information presented to them. In the end, I don’t think if we inside the security profession really comprehend just how far behind the rest of the populace is in understanding the issues of cyber security.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Applications, Bad Developers, Bad Stuff, Dumb Security, Industry Specialists Talk, Research, Risk Management, Vulnerability Management, Web Application Security, cyber crime, governance | 14 Comments »

AISA – Challenges, Change and the Future – Interview with AISA Chair, Stephan Overbeek

Posted on July 11th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

I’ve posted before about the Australian Information Security Association. AISA is volunteer run organisation of Information Security professionals with branches in almost every capital city in Australia and in excess of 800 members. The number of members in recent times has grown significantly and AISA as an “organisation” as opposed to an “Interest Group”, which it started as, is growing also. In this chat with Stephan Overbeek (the current Australian Chair) of AISA, we talk about the organisation, focus on valid questions and concerns raised by many in the industry here (including myself) about AISA and look at what AISA’s plans for the future are. (Note: I am an AISA member and a volunteer on the Executive committee as I have mentioned in the past).

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Industry Specialists Talk | No Comments »

The Pope is coming so you must be nice or you’ll be in trouble…

Posted on July 3rd, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By straxd

Nobody expects an Australian inquisition….

Most of you have probably heard by now that new regulations have been enacted for World Youth Day in Sydney which allow police to fine up to $5500 and possibly imprison people who “annoy and inconvenience” World Youth Day participants. From the SMH; co-incidentally written by Julian of Chaser fame. One could put forward the argument that this has been setup for the Chaser team and other organised mobs are being discriminated against unfairly. Why should the Chaser team spoil the fun for everyone! :-)

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Bad Stuff, Dumb Security, Industry Specialists Talk, WTF | 15 Comments »

It’s all just a matter of time and accessibility and everything today is breakable in the short term future…

Posted on June 26th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By YanaBanana and Drazen Drazic

Not talking about a new theory here but maybe some points worth discussion. Starting ramble:

With the increase in technology becoming more accessible and affordable to the masses, we face a good deal of unseen or unintended consequences on security in general.

Eg; Insurgencies in countries such as Iraq where homemade rockets are used, are getting more sophisticated. If anyone has ever tried to build a rocket (not the WMD type), (like myself), you will find that it is surprisingly hard to get it to fly straight. With processors/microcontrollers getting cheaper and more accessible, it’s relatively easy to make extremely good guidance systems now to attach to your homemade rocket – ready to fire at any target you wish.

Now apply this kind of thinking to something less bodily harm inducing such as GSM cracking. Not long ago, it was extremely expensive to get any sort of decent RF equipment to sniff GSM traffic, and then the computing power to actually break the poorly designed encryption (A5/1 and A5/2).

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Bad Developers, Bad Stuff, Dumb Security, Industry Specialists Talk, Research, WTF, cyber crime | 3 Comments »

IT Media – Cutting Edge Reporting

Posted on June 12th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By Big Galoot

Here we go again. Yet another example of highly questionable reporting in our local IT media. Ladies & gents, these type of ’stories’ need to be highlighted for what they really are – paid advertising.

This time, it’s our old friend at Symantec – schmoozing big time, one expects, in the hope of favourable commentary & cheap brand exposure in the Australian IT newspaper.

Whats the ’story’, you ask?

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Bad Stuff, Big Galoot Diatribe, Dumb Security, Industry Specialists Talk, Vulnerability Management, WTF, cyber crime | 15 Comments »

The Common Configuration Scoring System – NIST Draft

Posted on June 12th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By Donal O Duibhir

Donal looks at “The Common Configuration Scoring System” draft from NIST:

http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts/nistir-7502/Draft-NISTIR-7502.pdf

Initial thoughts: It would be nice to see CCSS as an output metric generated by the tools here: http://www.cisecurity.org/index.html, but further investigation leads me to believe the initiative hasn’t been
as well thought through as CVSSv2 or the OSSTMM Risk Assessment Values here: http://www.isecom.org/research/ravs.shtml perhaps.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Industry Specialists Talk, Research, Risk Management, Vulnerability Management, cyber crime | No Comments »

Microsoft serves COFEE to the police…and a death sentence to employee!?

Posted on May 1st, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By Declan Ingram

Upon speculation that Microsoft had build backdoors into Vista, Niels Ferguson, a developer and cryptographer at Microsoft wrote:

“The suggestion is that we are working with governments to create a back door so that they can always access BitLocker-encrypted data……..Over my dead body

That’s very reassuring.. Until this was released : “Microsoft device helps police pluck evidence from cyberscene of crime“.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Bad Stuff, Industry Specialists Talk, Research, WTF, cyber crime | 9 Comments »

Logs – A double-edged sword? Beating PCI Fines by bad security practices?

Posted on April 23rd, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

By Declan Ingram

PCI clearly states in requirement 10: “Track and monitor all access to network resources and cardholder data” And rightly so. It goes on to say “Determining the cause of a compromise is very difficult without system activity logs.”

It certainly is. Infact, for nearly all attacks where card data is at stake, it can border on impossible. Enterprise log management is hard. It is expensive, and there are few organisations that do it well. Not only that, but the organisations that do it well are also much more likely to have their general state of security much higher – meaning that (all things being equal) they are less likely to suffer a breach in the first place.
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Industry Specialists Talk, PCI, PCI DSS, cyber crime | 7 Comments »

Big Galoot Diatribe – Superheroes and independence of expert witnesses

Posted on March 28th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

The rantings of Craig Chapman, IT Security Legend and good bloke.

I’ve previously drivelled-on about the time I was approached at a conference by a couple of computer forensic ‘experts’ from a global IT co.

If you believed their story, these guys were IT super-heroes. The only things missing from this pair of turkeys was their red capes, masks and tight fitting, lycra underpants (although I strongly suspect these were being worn under their tailored suits).

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Big Galoot Diatribe, Forensics, Industry Specialists Talk, cyber crime | No Comments »

Anchored in time and tech?

Posted on March 20th, 2008 by Drazen Drazic

New Columnist: Donal O Duibhir

Why do we beat our heads against brick walls? Is it a form of mass masochism in Information Technology? Who built the walls? Who architected the building, and did they realise the building was supposed to travel in time like Doctor Who’s tardis while repelling alien invaders? …all the while the owners, masters and operators changing every so often without leaving enough intellectual property in the form of documentation or related artefacts… Why is this?

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Industry Specialists Talk, Uncategorized | 7 Comments »